FHFA Closes Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac NY Offices Over Letitia James

When Letitia James found herself at the centre of a storm with the nation’s two biggest mortgage‑backed securities giants, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) didn’t waste any time. On October 1, 2025 the regulator ordered the permanent shutdown of the New York State offices of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, citing what officials called the Attorney General’s "corrupt and dangerous business practices." The move is unprecedented, and its ripple effect could reshape mortgage financing in the nation’s biggest housing market.

Background: A Growing Federal‑State Clash

The drama didn’t start with a single office door. It traces back to a series of investigations into James’s personal real‑estate filings. Prosecutors allege she misrepresented a New York property, claiming it housed four units when, on paper, it actually contained five. That discrepancy, they say, let her shave off thousands of dollars in mortgage costs – a classic case of mortgage fraud.

In early 2024, the Attorney General’s office secured a civil verdict against former President Donald Trump for fraud, netting the state more than $350 million in penalties. The win made James a lightning rod – praised by some, reviled by others, especially Trump’s allies.

Enter FHFA Director Bill Pulte. In July 2025 he filed a criminal referral against James, alleging the same paperwork discrepancies rose to the level of fraud. While a grand jury has yet to indict, the referral gave the agency a foothold to act.

What the Office Closures Entail

The two locations, tucked just blocks away from Midtown Manhattan’s bustling corridors, were more than just desks and coffee machines. They housed roughly 200 employees – loan officers, compliance analysts, and support staff who handled a sizable chunk of New York’s $1.2 trillion mortgage pipeline.

According to a senior FHFA source, the physical sites are now empty, but the work isn’t stopping. "We'll still employ New York residents, and we'll still continue to do mortgage loans in New York, of course," the source told Fox News Digital. "But we are going to eliminate our physical presence. And to the extent that we have leases, we are going to sublease those."

In practical terms, the two GSEs will shift to a virtual‑first model. Employees will log in from remote locations, and the agencies will rely on existing data centers and cloud services to keep the loan‑processing engine humming. The subleasing plan could free up an estimated $12 million in annual operating costs – money FHFA says will be redirected toward compliance upgrades.

Reactions From Stakeholders

Industry insiders are split. Erik Siebert, who briefly served as Acting U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, warned that the closure could "send a chilling signal to lenders about the volatility of regulatory environments." He recalled stepping down after reportedly encountering White House pressure to push the case forward despite shaky evidence.

Conversely, a spokesperson for the New York Bankers Association said the move "doesn't change the fundamentals of mortgage availability" but urged the FHFA to "ensure that borrowers aren’t caught in a bureaucratic tug‑of‑war that could delay approvals."

Local politicians voiced concern, too. A Democratic assembly member from Brooklyn noted that removing a physical foothold might reduce transparency, while a Republican senator from upstate New York hailed the decision as “a bold stand against overreaching state officials.”

Implications for the Mortgage Market

Both GSEs together guarantee over $2 trillion in home loans nationwide. Pulling their bricks‑and‑mortar presence from the Empire State could nudge lenders to seek alternative channels – private‑label securities, direct bank financing, or even emerging fintech platforms.

Data from the Mortgage Bankers Association shows that New York accounts for roughly 9 percent of all Fannie and Freddie‑backed loans. If the virtual model slows processing by even 10 percent, borrowers could face longer wait times and potentially higher rates, especially in the high‑priced Manhattan market.

On the flip side, the cost savings from subleasing might allow the GSEs to offer slightly more competitive pricing elsewhere, a benefit that could offset some regional strain.

What Comes Next?

For now, the FHFA says it will monitor the transition closely. An internal audit slated for early 2026 will assess whether the remote model meets the agency’s “operational stability” benchmarks.

Meanwhile, prosecutors in New York continue to review James’ alleged mortgage filings. No criminal charges have been filed yet, but the criminal referral remains on the table. If an indictment does materialise, it could reignite the political firestorm that first ignited this saga.

Borrowers, lenders, and state regulators alike are watching closely. The next few months will likely determine whether the virtual‑first experiment becomes a new norm for federal housing finance or a cautionary footnote in an ongoing power struggle.

Frequently Asked Questions